So
What Does an Art Teacher Know About English Anyway!
Excuses, Excuses!
Blame It On the Style Guides
A few weeks ago I was inspired by June
Casagrande's column, A Word Please.
It appears in the Glendale News-Press,
an affiliate of the LA Times. I often
clip her columns to read later or to follow up
on her inspiration—later, of course.
This particular column was on spelling. You know,
stuff like spelling bees and how brilliant kids
can humiliate adults in certain arenas. On how
Brits spell differently from Americans. That reminded
me of how us Americans nurtured on British literature
have so many problems with spelling. (I still
can't get "grey" right.)
And that reminded me of something else. You’re
going to have to follow me on the way my mind
works, one step at a time. You’re going to have
to do it because it’s going to make you feel a
lot better about how your mind works!
Oh! Where were we? Yes. Spelling! And let’s not
even talk about syntax or how we use prepositions
differently from our English friends.
But June’s column also reminded me of what a
great speller I am. Or thought I was. As a child
I was pretty darn good at those spelling bees
myself. I got straight As in English and on and
on. Then, one day I spelled a word wrong—in
an art class of all places! My teacher asked me
to look at the word. Nothing came to me but "Duhhh."
Then he asked some of my classmates to look at
the word. I can't even tell you what the word
was. Maybe something like "definitely" because
it had something to do with an "i" and "a." None
of my classmates had a clue either. So the teacher
says—or rather rants, "See, see? That's
why we have dictionaries!"
So he had a point worth taking. But what does
an art teacher know about English. That’s a rhetorical
question. I’m sure he had no idea how English
would change over the decades. For example, computers
didn’t exist, so how could he have known about
the choices we have with words like “Web site”
(the New York Times’s version) and “website”
a la the LA Times.
Nevertheless, in that moment my confidence went
down the proverbial drain. In this case the drain
of spelling awareness. Now, even when I know I'm
right, I fear I'm not. Do I remember the spelling
the way I did it "before" when I spelled it wrong,
or am I remembering the "after" when I had checked
to see if I had it right. I can’t remember. I
go back to the dictionary, maybe for the fifteen
time on the same word. Or use my Word Spell Checker.
And half the time even it doesn’t know!
Geesht. Such a waste of time and brain power.
One of those before and after words for me is
"recommendation." Two "c's" and two "m's" or only
one "c" and... Well, you get the idea. There are
times that Word's spell checker is a Godsend.
I have it on autopilot. It doesn't even tell me
when I spell "recommendation" wrong. It just corrects
it. That I get no practice is probably one of
the reasons that I can't remember how to spell
it. Someone or something is doing my work for
me.
So when people start thinking that because I
wrote a book on editing or because I am
The Frugal, Smart and Tuned-In Editor on my blog,
that I know everything about English, I must own
up. I have to check spelling and grammar stuff.
I have to do it a lot. It’s partially
the fault of a brain full of trivia (yes, some
grammar is trivia!), but it’s also because English
has changed over time.
Some rules that we think of as hard and fast
rules aren’t rules at all. The well-loved Strunk
and White was originally a guide written for
the author’s students that included his preferences
for writing and people started taking his (strong)
suggestions for what he wanted in the papers submitted
to him as commandments of Biblical proportions.
There’s another reason, too. English isn’t nearly
as rule-oriented as people think it is (or would
like it to be!). We get to make style choices.
The style designated by the publishers of books
is often more stringent that the styles espoused
by newspapers. I do both kinds of writing and
you expect me keep all those choices straight?
Forget it!
I don’t and you don’t. We don’t have to.
We can use something editors call style guides.
Chicago
Manual of Style is the one I use when
I’m writing a book and AP is the one I use when
I’m freelancing for newspapers. You can get AP
online at http://www.apstylebook.com.
And sometimes I plain don’t care. I’ll push two
words into one that should be kept separate when
I’m writing poetry (and sometimes in my other
writing, too); occasionally I use the wrong homonym
to add a layer of meaning. The thing is, languages
develop. There is a creative aspect to them.
Sometimes I get to choose whatever I darn well
prefer because the guides—even the dictionaries!—don’t
agree. So, I’m sticking with “e-mail” over “email.”
Both are correct. The former makes more sense
to me.
The thing is, I’m not trying to convince anyone
it’s right! That would be a losing battle, anyway.
|
Tips and
Tidbits
(Each month in this box, Carolyn lists
a Tidbit that will help authors write or
promote better. She will also include a
Tip to help readers find a treasure among
long-neglected books or a sapphire among
the newly-published.)
Writers' Tidbit:
Writers interested in their craft know that
last-minute edits can mean the difference
between success and failure. My new booklet,
Great Little Last Minute Editing Tips
for Writers, will help all writers,
from those who write business letters to
those who pen poetry. Find it on Amazon.
Readers' Tip:
Irene Watson edits a site where you can
find book reviews of all kinds. It is Reader
Views. |

Winners feel free to capture
a banner for your website!


|